Legal Opinion

Trotter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 22, 1974PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL, Judge.

Robert Trotter and Pat Trotter, represented on appeal by separate retained counsel, seek reversals of their respective convictions upon a joint trial for extortion, as proscribed by T.C.A. § 39-4301, and penitentiary sentences of two (2) years. Although separately filed, the two assignments of alleged error are the same for both plaintiffs-in-error.

The legal sufficiency of the convicting evidence is questioned. The two men, under the State’s proof, went to the house of one Bradford and stated to him that they had a warrant for his arrest for permitting his daughters to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steinhardt & Co. v. Galveston Cotton Seed Meal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Cooper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. DykesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. State v. BurtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. State v. DraperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API