Legal Opinion
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Eisner
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
In this action to foreclose a mortgage, a motion was made for a deficiency judgment. Conflicting affidavits were presented as to the value of the property and it was referred to an official referee “ to take testimony as to the fair market value of the premises and report the same to this court, together with his opinion.”
The referee reported that, in his opinion, the fair market value of the property was $9,800. A motion having been made at Special Term to confirm the referee’s report, the' justice presiding viewed the premises, and wrote an opinion in which he referred to the fact that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- New York Life Insurance v. H. & J. Guttag Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- McCamman v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broward National Bank of Fort Lauderdale v. StarzecAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Ogdensburg Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tompkins County Trust Co. v. HerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Evergreen Bank v. D & P Justin's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- TPZ Corp. v. Block 7589 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.