Legal Opinion

Constar, Inc., and David Butler Co. v. Plumbers Local 447

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1984No. 83-2316PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

I. FACTS.

This is an action for damages under § 303 of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 187(b). The plaintiffs are a building contractor and a developer; the defendant is a labor union. Judgment was for the union.

Constar, the general contractor for a building, contracted for the plumbing work with Ponderosa Plumbing, and Ponderosa had a dispute with defendant union. At the construction site, which was fenced, Constar designated one gate as “reserved” for Ponderosa. There, the union could and did picket whenever Ponderosa was doing work or having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Constar, Inc. v. Plumbers Local 447District Court, E.D. California · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
  2. Butchers' Union, Local No. 498 v. SDC Investment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1986
  3. Mautz & Oren, Inc. v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, And Helpers Union, Local No. 279Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Mautz & Oren, Inc. v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, & Helpers Union, Local No. 279Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Miller v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2District Court, N.D. California · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API