Alexander v. Admr, Unemployment Compensation
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The appeal is upon the grounds that (1) the commissioner’s conclusion is not consistent with the subordinate facts found, and (2) it does not appear that plaintiff was available for work within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation Act.
The commissioner has found, in substance, that the plaintiff, a thirty-eight-year-old married woman without children, voluntarily left a $60 per week job, which she had held for nine years, on August 4,1951, and on February 29,1952, refused a referral to a less responsible job paying $40 per week because the latter was not the type of work that she had…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Beckert v. AdministratorConnecticut Superior Court · 1955