United States v. One Durant Touring Car
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
At the hearing of the motion the merits of the intervener’s claim were presented. If the intervener could have no property in the automobile, nor any benefit from the setting aside of the default judgment, there would be no reason to set the same aside; hence the intervention, as well as the motion, were considered together.
The facts indicate that at 3 or 4 o’clock in the morning, on the banks of the Eio Grande, at or near El Paso, Tex'., where that river marks the boundary between the United States and Mexico, several United States customs officials, liaving had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Charles Zimmerman Sons Co. v. FergusonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
- United States v. Eva Mae ClantonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959