Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Zediker v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1926No. 24890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

From conviction of larceny, after his separate trial, upon information filed in the district court for Box Butte county charging the defendant (plaintiff in error) and three others in one count jointly with burglary and larceny, alleged to have been committed at the same time and as one transaction by all defendants, Urban Zediker has appealed.

The first question presented by the record is the legal effect of the verdict returned by the jury that they “do find the defendant Urban Zediker guilty of larceny,” *294and containing no finding on the charge of burglary.- The contention is made that this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. People v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stagemeyer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pospishil v. KempNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. KnechtNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. State v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API