Legal Opinion

Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1918No. 20217PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: P. James Cosgrave, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

The plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Lancaster county to recover the value of a car-load, of flour alleged to haye been converted by the defendant. The flour was shipped by the WashburnCrosby Company of Minneapolis, and a controversy arose between that company and the plaintiff ás to tbe right to the flour. It was the duty of the defendant railroad company to deliver the flour to the true owner, and it was delivered to the Minneapolis company. The question, then, is whether the Minneapolis company or this plaintiff was the owner of the flour and entitled to the delivery…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potucek v. Cordeleria LourdesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  2. Potucek v. LourdesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Farmers Grain & General Shipping Ass'n v. JordanNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. K. Tideman & Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API