Rex S. Lovett v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*658BAILEY, Judge. .
Case Summary
Rex Lovett (“Lovett”) filed a petition for relief from sex offender registration requirements under Indiana’s Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”). The trial court denied his petition. Lovett appeals, arguing that the registration requirement is unconstitutional as applied to him because it violates the ex post facto clause of the Indiana Constitution. Because Lovett was, at the time of and as a result of his original offense, subject to sex offender reporting requirements in another state, we conclude that an ongoing requirement to register in Indiana is not an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Thomas H. Andrews v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jerome Michael Burton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- State of Indiana v. Terry J. HoughIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Herron v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Golden Foods, Inc., and Lewis R. CoulterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016