In re Pye
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Erastus Van Houten from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Rockland county, entered in the office bf said Surrogate’s Court on the 3d day of February, 1897, adjudging him guilty of contempt and fining him $3,134.94.
1Opinion of the Court
Bradley, J. :
In this proceeding, instituted in behalf of the creditors of the appellant’s testator to revoke the letters testamentary issued to him, the order was made to that effect, and it was further ordered that “ he pay and deliver over to Anna L. Van Houten and Della Van Houten, executrices of Edward G. Van Honten, deceased, or their representatives, all money and property or the proceeds thereof which belonged to the estate of said deceased, or which came into ■ his possession as executor, and all property belonging' to the estate of said deceased now in his possession and under his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hudson v. ReeveNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duck v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Ehlenfield v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of ScheuerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- In re the Estate of IsaacsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
- In re the Estate of KahrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.