Legal Opinion

McKenna v. City of Paterson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 11, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeher, J.

This writ brings up the conviction of prosecutor on a complaint charging a violation of section 6 of an ordinance of the city of Paterson, entitled “An ordinance to license and regulate the business of transient merchants or itinerant vendors in the city of Paterson,” approved December 19th, 1931. The return to the writ includes a stenographic transcript of the testimony taken on the hearing of the complaint.

It is necessary to consider only one of the reasons advanced by prosecutor for setting aside the conviction, viz., that the complaint did not charge a violation of the ordinance. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broad & Sansom Realty Co. v. Fidelity Building Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Hommel v. Township of East HanoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Tucker v. RandallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API