Vickers v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
SEITZ, Justice:
The appellant, Donta E. Vickers, filed this appeal from the Superior Court’s sentence, declaring Vickers a habitual offender under the Delaware Criminal Code. 1 Vickers argues that the Superior Court erred as a matter of law in sentencing him to life in prison as a habitual offender because the first of his three predicate felony convictions occurred when he was a juvenile. We find no merit in the appeal and therefore affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The victim of the crimes (the “robbery victim”) rented a room in a house on Kim-mey Street in Georgetown, Delaware. 2 Around…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Javonne WilksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Jeremiah TeasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- State v. HubbardSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. McDougaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.