Legal Opinion

Dowda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1982No. 82-906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

The trial court declared appellant’s pro se 3.850 motion a nullity, stating that appellant cannot file a pleading when represented by counsel and citing Sheppard v. State, 391 So.2d 346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The trouble is that the rule requires that such motions be given an evidentiary hearing unless the files and records conclusively show entitlement to no relief and, when so, that such files and records be attached to the order. There is nothing attached to the appealed order showing that appellant has counsel appointed or retained to file and prosecute his 3.850 motion.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Meintzer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Murray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API