Cord v. Barry
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal.from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. G. W. Wakefield, Judge. Action at law to recover the value of seven hundred and sixty bushels of corn, alleged to be due, under a written lease, on account of rent for the year 1894, and for a landlord’s attachment.
Read the full summary
Appeal.from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. G. W. Wakefield, Judge. Action at law to recover the value of seven hundred and sixty bushels of corn, alleged to be due, under a written lease, on account of rent for the year 1894, and for a landlord’s attachment. The defendant answered, admitting the execution of the lease, and alleging a subsequent oral agreement by which the amount of rent corn and the time of delivery were changed, and that he has fully performed said oral agreement. He also alleges, by way of counter-claim, that the attachment was wrongfully sued out, and asks damages.…
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
Appellant’s abstract was served February 7, and filed February 10, 1894, wherein he says: “And this abstract contains all of the evidence produced, offered, and introduced upon the trial of this case, the objections thereto and the rulings thereon, and all exceptions taken, all of the instructions of the court, and the instructions asked by the plaintiff, and is a complete and true abstract of the record therein.” February 22, 1896, appellee filed an amendment to the abstract, wherein he denies that said abstract and amendment contain “all the record, or all the pleadings, or all the evidence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chapin v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Lookabill v. Foulks Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891