Legal Opinion
Manzo v. Reynolds
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 29, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
The defendant-landlady Marilynn Reynolds, appearing pro se, appeals the Superi- or Court’s affirmance of a small claims judgment entered in the District Court in favor of the plaintiff-tenant James Manzo. Agreeing with the Superior Court that the defendant did not present an adequate record on appeal, we affirm the judgment.
On July 28, 1983, the plaintiff-tenant filed a complaint in the District Court (Wa-terville), alleging the defendant owed him $300 because the apartment he leased from her had no lock on the door, and someone broke in and stole some of his clothing. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meyer v. MeyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- State v. MeyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Boothbay Register, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Cates v. FarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- International Silver Co. v. DiGirolamoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manon Cote v. Roger ValleeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Sea View Motel, Inc. v. M. Cayouette FlooringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985