Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. North
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. A motion is made to dismiss the writ of error “because no one is named or otherwise disclosed by the bill of exceptions as plaintiff in error.” The bill of exceptions does not formally name the defendant insurance company as the plaintiff in error, whereas it does formally name the plaintiff '“as defendant in error,” but the bill of exceptions states that “on January 20, 1942, at the regular January term of the trial court, before Judge T. O. Hathcock presiding, there came on to be tried the case of Bessie North v. Bankers Health & Life Ins. Company, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Joiner v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Gray v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Rosenheim Shoe Co. v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Branch v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yellow Cab Company v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944