Oliver Ditson Co. v. Testa
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court overruling a plea in abatement. There has been no trial on the merits and no judgment. Hence the case is not properly *110here. It has been decided many times that this court has no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from any interlocutory decision until after judgment unless the judge reports the question. Cotter v. Nathan & Hurst Co. 211 Mass. 31, and cases cited. Cummings v. Ayer, 188 Mass. 292. Fay v. Upton, 153 Mass. 6. Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. Cram, 212 Mass. 108.
C. Toye, for the defendant. A. M. Schwarz & S. A. Dearborn, for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shawmut Commercial Paper Co. v. CramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Cummings v. AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Cotter v. Nathan & Hurst Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Fay v. Inhabitants of UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Farris v. St. Paul's Baptist ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Zuccaro v. NazzaroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914