Legal Opinion

Boise Assn. of Credit Men v. Seawell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1929No. 5094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

The appellant in this court, defendant in the trial court, insists that pending the approval of application, in all respects regular and complete, by an investment company for authority to sell its stock and its application for the issuance of licenses to its agents, as required by the provisions of the “Blue Sky Law” of this state, all contracts entered into by such agents on behalf of such investment company are illegal and unenforceable. The question is presented in the following manner: On August 11, 1920, the Payette Cooperative Company filed in the office of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steinour v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Ashley & Rumelin v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. McKinlay v. Javan Mines Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Wood v. Independent School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Sharp v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Tway v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. LawlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc. v. JeanDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API