Hopkins v. . Swain
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClabicsoN, J.
We do not think that any of the exceptions and assignments of error made by plaintiff can be sustained. In the record, we find: The report of sale, the motion before the clerk to order a resale, the order of resale, the complaint by plaintiff for specific performance, notice of lis pendens by plaintiff, answer of defendant. The following notice was served on plaintiff: “The plaintiff is hereby notified that the defendant will, on 10 February, 1934, at 4:00 o’clock p.m., move before his Honor, Walter L. Small, at Elizabeth City, N. 0., to vacate the sale heretofore held on 19 December, 1933,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seip v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Parker v. . McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Worth v. Piedmont Bank of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Corbin v. Berry & McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936