Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. . Swain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabicsoN, J.

We do not think that any of the exceptions and assignments of error made by plaintiff can be sustained. In the record, we find: The report of sale, the motion before the clerk to order a resale, the order of resale, the complaint by plaintiff for specific performance, notice of lis pendens by plaintiff, answer of defendant. The following notice was served on plaintiff: “The plaintiff is hereby notified that the defendant will, on 10 February, 1934, at 4:00 o’clock p.m., move before his Honor, Walter L. Small, at Elizabeth City, N. 0., to vacate the sale heretofore held on 19 December, 1933,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seip v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Hamilton v. . IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Parker v. . McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Worth v. Piedmont Bank of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Corbin v. Berry & McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API