Legal Opinion

Cunard S. S. Co. v. Stranahan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 16, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On Demurrer to Complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

I find that in giving my reasons, at the close of the argument, for overruling the demurrer to the complaint, I was under a misapprehension in assuming that the collector required the payment of the so-called “fines” without express-authority ; that is, that' the statute did not provide any specific method0of enforcing their payment. -Upon this assumption I expressed the opinion that the penalty or fine could only be enforced by judicial proceedings, overlooking the clause authorizing the collector to refuse clearance papers to the vessel while the penalty remains…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The MaryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812
  2. The Wilson v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1820
  3. The BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1812

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. International Mercantile Marine Co. v. StranahanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Pincock v. FranklinUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. ArnusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. Clyde S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API