Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Berry

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1927No. Appeal 68PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

'This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit to recover back money paid on account of the purchase price of real estate. In the agreement the defendant contracted to sell as agent for Flanagan. In his affidavit of defense he admitted that he still held the money “as agent for Flanagan, defendant [plaintiff?] having failed to carry into effect the provisions of the agreement. ’ ’ The evidence is that Flanagan did not have the legal title to the premises at the time fixed for settlement, or at any other time, though defendant proposed (but was not permitted) to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Artzerounian v. DemetriadesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Gable v. CraneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yentis v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Bezold v. PotamkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Byer v. BlauSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Shlak v. E. F. Houghton Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API