Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Dowd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal No. 1: Order granting the motion of the referee to punish Charles F. Brown, the purchaser, appellant, for contempt of court reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Appeal No. 2: Order denying the motion of Charles F. Brown to be relieved of his bid and purchase reversed on the law and *903the facts, without costs, and motion granted. These appeals were consolidated and heard together. The order granting the motion of the referee to punish the appellant purchaser for contempt of court must be reversed: First, because the order is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Briddon v. . BriddonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Gordon v. FeldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Mutual Milk & Cream Co. v. TietjenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Bergin v. DeeringNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackstone Institute, Inc. v. AgnelliCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  2. Hicks v. CorlewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Perez v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Walsh v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API