Legal Opinion
Bruder v. 979 Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 18, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), entered April 24, 2002, as, upon granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Silver Rail Construction Corp., sued herein as Silver Rail Assoc., Inc., which was to dismiss the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action insofar as asserted against it, made at the close of the evidence, and upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant 979 Corporation on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kane v. CoundorousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Whalen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Morra v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Constantino v. Kreisler Borg Florman General Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linkowski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Brown v. Brause Plaza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Navarro v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gonzalez v. Pon Lin Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006