Legal Opinion

McRae v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 2001No. A01A1426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Thessalonias McRae guilty of armed robbery. McRae appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial, asserting that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that his statement to police and the statements and testimony of two witnesses were inadmissible, that trial counsel was ineffective, and that he was denied a commitment and bond hearing. Finding no error in the trial court’s rulings, we affirm.

1. McRae raises several arguments challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. In reviewing McRae’s assertions, we view the evidence

in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Holcomb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. McClarity v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lockett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Bass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Clonts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API