Legal Opinion

Coles v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2002No. 00-CF-1570PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

After a jury deadlocked at his first trial, Paul Coles was retried on charges of *487armed robbery1 and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence (PFCV)2 relating to the robbery at gunpoint of Redoduane Abderrafe. The jury at his second trial found Coles guilty on both counts, and he now appeals. Coles’ primary contention is that the trial judge committed reversible error by restricting Coles’ cross-examination of a prosecution witness. We disagree and affirm.

I

THE EVIDENCE

At Coles’ trial, the prosecution presented evidence which, if credited,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Longus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Bryant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. O'Brien v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API