Glaser v. Meck
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Justice.
1. Under OCGA § 9-11-12 (b), all defenses (except certain enumerated motions) “shall be asserted in the responsive pleadings.”
The defense raised by the appellee, Dr. Meek (a failure to attach to the complaint at the time of filing a certain affidavit) was not “asserted in the responsive pleading.” Nor was that defense one of the enumerated motions.
Indeed, it was not presented, by way of amendment to the answer, until three months after the filing of responsive pleadings, and until the statute of limitations on the underlying claim had run.
2. Had the failure to comply with new…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Housing Auth. of Savannah v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Cheeley v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. NeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Chandler v. OPENSIDED MRI OF ATLANTA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Bonner v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.