Legal Opinion

Martin v. Dorn Equipment Co., Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1991No. 91-021PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

John and Peggy Martin appeal from the October 24,1990, order of the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, granting the motion of Dorn Equipment Company, Inc., and Sperry-New Holland (collectively, the respondents) for summary judgment. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

The issues raised on appeal are whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment by:

1. Failing to consider the deposition of Richard Jeppson;

2. Concluding as a matter of law that no breach of the peace occurred during a repossession; and

3. Finding that no material facts exist to support the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hereford v. HerefordMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Canal Insurance v. BundayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Westmont Tractor Co. v. Continental I, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Laurel Coal Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hollibush v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Johnston v. American Reliable InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fossen v. FossenMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Johnston v. American Reliable InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API