Legal Opinion

Tibbetts v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1922No. 22,895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

In 1915 Mary E. Tibbetts executed a will in due form. In 1918 she executed a second will in due form which contained a clause revoking all prior wills. In 1920, for the purpose of revoking the second will and leaving the first will in force, she burned the second will in the presence of two disinterested witnesses whom she called in to witness its destruction and to whom she declared her purpose in destroying it. She died in February, 1921, and thereafter the first will was duly admitted to probate by the probate court. On appeal the will was also sustained by the district court. A…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pickens v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Cheever v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Colvin v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  5. Blackett v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Derr v. DerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. In Re Estate of AnthonySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Burtt WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API