Legal Opinion
Roether v. Pearson
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 16, 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
36 N.J. Super. 465 (1955)
116 A.2d 529
DOROTHY A. ROETHER AND JOHN J. ROETHER, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS R. PEARSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 8, 1955.
Decided August 16, 1955.
Before Judges CONFORD, KNIGHT and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Robert P. Hanley argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Edward F. Broderick, attorney).
Mr. Robert L. Clifford argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an automobile…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Moore v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Stevens v. RoettgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Heick v. EiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Gustavson v. GaynorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Yost v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Kulbacki v. SobchinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- George W. Eschelbach v. William S. Scull Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.