Legal Opinion

State v. Rollings

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1937No. 3180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The preliminary examination must be had without delay. Secs. 10744, 10764, 10768, 10770 N.C.L.

The examination must be completed in six days, unless by consent or motion of the defendant. Section 10771 N.C.L.

This requirement is jurisdictional. Ex Parte Ah Kee, 22 Nev. 374,40 P. 879.

The defendant had an absolute right to counsel of his own choice at every stage of the preliminary proceedings. Art. I, sec. 8, Constitution of Nevada; secs. 10654, 10768-9 N.C.L.; State v. Crosby, 24 Nev. 115, 122, 50 P. 127; 8 R.C.L. 83, nn. 1, 4; State v. Oberst (Kan.), 273 P. 490, 492; Powell v. Alabama,287 U.S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. OberstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. MircovichNevada Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sturrock v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Patterson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Dotseth v. Justice Court, Tucson, Precinct No. OneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. State v. McRoyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Patterson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API