Lietz v. Primock
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
Plaintiff Connie D. Lietz, an adjudged incompetent, by her guardian ad litem, Julia P. Ellis, filed a third amended complaint against Paul H. Primock, Arthur M. Agasie and Nell Agasie, his wife. The defendants moved to dismiss the third cause of action in the third amended complaint for failure to state a claim. The trial court granted this motion, and two weeks later it signed and approved a formal order of dismissal in which it ordered the third cause of action “dismissed insofar as said cause of action refers to the defendant Paul H. Primock.” Plaintiff appeals from this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Law v. SidneyArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lakin Cattle Company v. EngelthalerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Patania v. SilverstoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Lewin v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.