Legal Opinion
Wilder v. CHARLES BELL PONTIAC-BUICK
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 22, 1990No. 89-51PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, Bernice Wilder, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant. The appeal relates to count 2, which charged the defendant with wrongfully taking her automobile and certain personal property in it. No issue with respect to that portion of the judgment pertaining to count 1 is presented by this appeal.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Wilder, who lives and works in Columbus, Georgia, visited an automobile dealership operated by the defendant, Charles Bell Pontiac-Buick, Cadillac-GMC, Inc. ("Charles Bell"), in Tuskegee, Alabama, as a prospective buyer of a new car. During…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ott v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Allstate Enterprises, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- A. C. Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1972
- Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation v. WeeksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- HUNTSVILLE GOLF v. Ratcliff, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Rice v. Birmingham Coal & Coke Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Gabrielson v. Healthcorp of Eufaula, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Dardess v. BlasingameSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Manning Service Co. v. Community Blood & Plasma Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.