Legal Opinion

(HC) Metts-Montez v. Pallares

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 19, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00400Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRINITY METTS-MONTEZ, No. 2:21-cv-0400 JAM KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MICHAEL PALLARES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action alleging the 19 petition was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations, and claim three fails to state a 20 cognizable federal claim. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API