Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered November 30, 2011, which granted defendant *653New York City Housing Authority’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

NYCHA established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by submitting evidence showing that it was not aware that a tenant had been harboring the pit bull that attacked infant plaintiff (see Strunk v Zoltanski, 62 NY2d 572, 575 [1984]). Even if knowledge of the dog’s presence could be imputed, the evidence shows that NYCHA neither knew nor should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Carter v. Metro North AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Joe v. Orbit Industries, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Plue v. LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Wilson v. BruceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API