Legal Opinion

In Re Branch

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1969No. Crim. No. 11483Published

1Opinion of the Court

70 Cal.2d 200 (1969)

In re ROBERT A. BRANCH on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 11483.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Jan. 21, 1969.

Robert A. Branch, in pro. per., Thomas W. Bell, Jr., under appointment by the Supreme Court, and MacDonell, Bell & Sandberg for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Roger E. Venturi, Edward A. Hinz, Jr., and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

PETERS, J.

This petition involves petitioner's claim of inadequacy of his representation in that his counsel failed to investigate his claim that prior to or during the trial he had told his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API