Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Woodard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Shiawassee; Miner, J. Petition by Oramel B. Fuller against Sadie Woodard for the sale of certain lands for taxes thereon. From a decree for defendant, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

In this case the plaintiff seeks to sell defendant’s property for the nonpayment of a paving tax. The petition under 1 Comp. Laws, § 3304, as amended by Act No. 136, Pub. Acts 1899 (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3326) (which authorizes the construction of improvements when a majority of the owners of the frontage request it), was presented to the common council of the city of Owosso. Taking this as a basis for the jurisdiction for the construction of a pavement, the common council proceeded to make the improvement and levy the tax in question in this case.

Upon the filing of the petition of the auditor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Motz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Steckert v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Atwell v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Auditor General v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Taylor v. BurnapMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacOmb Building Co. v. Clinton TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API