Legal Opinion
The Government of the Canal Zone v. Arnold Maxwell Brooks
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1970No. 28373PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Brooks was convicted of the crime of returning to a military reservation after having been ordered not to reenter the reservation by the base commander, in contravention of 18 U.S.C. § 1382. 1 Brooks…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Douglas Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Andres Serrano Medina v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John Thomas FlowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- D'ALESSANDRO v. MukaseyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- George Kabeller, Inc. v. BuseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.