Legal Opinion

Reich v. Cochran

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from, special term, New York county. Action by Lorenz Reich against William F. Cochran. There was a judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

This action was brought to have an agreement in the form of a lease from defendant to plaintiff declared a mortgage to secure a loan with usurious interest, and to have the same declared void, and delivered up and canceled. The plaintiff, having obtained a lease of the Cambridge Hotel, assigned the same to defendant, who thereupon made a sublease of the same premises to plaintiff, which arrangement the plaintiff alleges was a mere cover for a usurious loan, and should therefore be held void. As a defense, it was alleged that defendant, through a duly-authorized agent, served upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. The People Ex Rel. Ainslee v. . HowlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Nemetty v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Traill v. OstermeierNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Reich v. CochranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Cochran v. ReichAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Reich v. CochranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Reich v. CochranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API