Legal Opinion

Watson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 5, 2009No. 08-746CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

In this pro se action, Plaintiff Mark J. Watson seeks damages relating to the United States Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) administration of the non-immigrant visa program under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., and DOL’s decision not to investigate Plaintiffs claims for damages. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs complaint shall be DISMISSED without prejudice.

Background

The present ease is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Mark J. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. Striplin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Braun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API