Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Carr

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 27, 2004No. 3867Published

1Opinion of the Court

361 S.C. 258 (2004)

603 S.E.2d 625

Raymond C. CAMPBELL, Respondent,

v.

Martha M. CARR and Ruth Riley Glover, Appellants.

No. 3867.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Submitted September 14, 2004.

Decided September 27, 2004.

H. Ronald Stanley, of Columbia, for Appellants.

Thomas G. Earle, of Columbia, for Respondent.

ANDERSON, J.:

Martha M. Carr and Ruth Riley Glover appeal the master-in-equity's ruling of specific performance. We reverse.[1]

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1996, Carr, a resident of New York, inherited from her mother a 108-acre tract of unimproved land. In 1998, Carr contacted the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  5. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API