Hummell v. Smale
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Hillsdale; Chester, J. Bill by John H. Hummell against Winifred C. Smale and others to set aside an attachment levy. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, C. J.
The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for the purpose of annulling and setting aside an attachment levied upon a .certain piece of real estate in the city of Hillsdale by defendants Winifred C. Smale and Julia S. Smale. The said attachment was levied by said defendants in an endeavor to collect a judgment which they had obtained against cross-defendants Charles H. Rowlson and Polly Rowlson. It appears that the complainant, a'man nearly 80 years of age, is the father of cross-defendant Polly Rowlson and father-in-law of her husband, cross-defendant Charles. H. Rowlson. It further…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hatch v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Anderson v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Pietraszewski v. AsiulewiczMichigan Supreme Court · 1927