Legal Opinion

State v. . McDowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment tried at Pall Term, 1880, of Henderson Superior Court, before Gilmer, J. The defendants demurred to the indictment, and from the judgment overruling the same, they appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtRuffin, J.

This was an indictment against the defendants as president and directors of the Buncombe Turnpike Company for not keeping in repair so much of the road belonging to the company as lies between the Buncombe line and the South Carolina line in Henderson county. The defendants demurred to the indictment and upon the overruling of the demurrer appealed to this court. The indictment is in the following words:

“ The jurors, &c., present that W. W. DcDowell, president, and V. Ripley, Mont. Patton, directors of the Buncombe Turnpike road, late of Henderson county, on the 8th day of September, 1879,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Wake County v. MagninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. State v. . PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. State v. . FishblateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Blackwell v. . McCaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. State v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. State v. . PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API