Bergdahl v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
jError to the District Court of San Miguel County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
By information filed in the court below, plaintiffs in error were jointly charged in two counts, (1) with breaking ore from certain mines with intent to steal; and (2) with removing ore from the same premises with intent to defraud. The information in this case was based upon the provisions of section 3234, 2 Mills’ Ann. Stats., which in terms provides that if any employé shall break and sever, with intent to steal, or shall take, remove or conceal the ore from any mine with intent to defraud the owner of such mine, such offender *304shall be deemed guilty of felony, and on conviction, shall be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1869
- Cummins v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Wickham v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Harris v. Municipal CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.