Woodfork v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Appellant-defendant Kenneth Woodfork (Woodfork) appeals his convictions for two counts of forgery 1, both as Class C felonies and theft2, a Class D felony, claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to grant a continuance so a defense witness could obtain a document and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.
We affirm.
FACTS
The facts which most support the convie-tions show that on September 19, 1989, Woodfork met Dalonda Clay (Clay) at a liquor store in Indianapolis. As they drove to Clay's apartment, Woodfork told her he had obtained…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Grassmyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Parr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Rivera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Schwindt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sublett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.