Legal Opinion

Woodfork v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1992No. 49A02-9018-CR-363PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellant-defendant Kenneth Woodfork (Woodfork) appeals his convictions for two counts of forgery 1, both as Class C felonies and theft2, a Class D felony, claiming that the trial court erred by refusing to grant a continuance so a defense witness could obtain a document and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts which most support the convie-tions show that on September 19, 1989, Woodfork met Dalonda Clay (Clay) at a liquor store in Indianapolis. As they drove to Clay's apartment, Woodfork told her he had obtained…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grassmyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Parr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rivera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Schwindt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Sublett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Floyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API