Legal Opinion

United States v. Ernesto Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1995No. 94-60733PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

Ernesto Rodriguez appeals the district court’s refusal to apply the “safety valve” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) so that he could escape the ten year mandatory minimum sentence of 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(A). In this appeal, we address whether a defendant’s statement to a probation officer satisfies the fifth requirement of § 3553(f). Because we answer that question in the negative, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Rodriguez pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Under the Sentencing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. United States v. GadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. RonningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Eric MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. William Delmer Edwards, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Miranda SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. George Woodrow FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. WrennCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API