Legal Opinion

Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1914No. 3418Published

Error from District Court, Grady County; Action by the Kentucky Bank & Trust Company and another against W. H. Pritchett and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion

On RbhsaRing.

It is urged in the petition for rehearing that the transfer of February 15, 1910, would constitute a preference under section 60 of the Barikruptcy Act of 1910 (Act June 25, 1910, c. 412, sec. 11, 36 St. at L. 842 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 1506J). This act was passed on June 25, 1910, which was subsequent to the date of the transfer in this case. The act in force prior to the amendment of 1910 was the act of 1898 as amended in T'k.5 (32 St. at L. 800), and under that section the question whether the- person receiving such preference had reasonable grounds to believe that a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. TredwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Hussey v. Richardson-Roberts Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Off v. HakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  5. Ridge Ave. Bank v. StudheimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API