Legal Opinion

Ripley's Case

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.

Workmen’s Compensation Case. The statutory reference are to Act of 1919 Chap. 238.

*174On August 20, 1919 the petitioner an employee of the Paris Manufacturing Co. suffered an industrial accident.

An agreement for compensation, approved by the Commissioner of Labor on Sept. 11, 1919, described the injury as “blood poisoning.” The agreement provided for compensation at $7.82 per week for an indefinite period beginning Aug. 30. The petitioners average weekly wage was $13.04. The weekly compensation was the maximum authorized by the statute then in force. $134.24 was paid. Upon payment of the last…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Brodin's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  3. Milton's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
  4. Lemelin's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  5. Foster's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  2. Rowe v. Keyes Fibre Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API