Legal Opinion

State v. Gilbert

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1996No. S-7020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We consider here whether the trial court prejudicially erred in allowing a prosecutorial comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to call a witness at trial. The court of appeals held that the comment was both impermissible and prejudicial, and reversed the conviction. We reverse, and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

B.M. was beaten and raped early April 13, 1988, in a snowy lot in Seward. Martin Gilbert was charged with the crimes. Gilbert was then a member of the crew of the F/V Valoris. He was questioned by police…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. William J. Gass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Bering Sea Fishermen's Ass'n v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API