Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Arnold
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bertram R. Gelfand, J.
In this probate proceeding, decedent’s will was previously admitted to probate by decree entered on April 15, 1983 (see Matter of Arnold, NYLJ, March 23, 1983, p 12, col 1). There remains for determination a number of issues arising from the principles enunciated in Matter of Putnam (257 NY 140). These were dealt with on an interim basis by the decree admitting the instrument to probate prohibiting any distribution of the legacies which were then subjudice with respect to Matter of Putnam (supra). A hearing with respect to those issues has now been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marx v. . McGlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- In Re the Will of PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In re the Estate of BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re the Probate of the Will of SatterleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- In re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of TankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986
- In re the Estate of RothbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1990