Legal Opinion
Claim of McLean v. Amsterdam Nursing Home
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 2010PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEgan Jr., J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 17, 2008, which ruled that liability shifted to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a.
Claimant sustained a work-related injury in July 1996 and received workers’ compensation benefits until March 1997, when she returned to work and her case was closed. In 2006, claimant applied to reopen her case and, following a hearing where claimant testified, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) determined, among other things, that liability for the claim had shifted to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Fuentes v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Iannaci v. Independent Cement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Lauritano v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Faison v. City of New York Department of Human ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by15 opinions
- Claim of Coleman v. Schenectady County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Guidice v. Herald Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Canfora v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Stranahan v. Camp AdirondackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Maguire v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.