Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1951 Cadillac Coupe De Ville
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 19, 1954No. 9763(2)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
125 F.Supp. 661 (1954)
UNITED STATES of America, Libelant,
v.
ONE 1951 CADILLAC COUPE DE VILLE, Motor No. 5162-03809, Respondent, and Lindburg Cadillac Company, Respondent-Intervenor.
No. 9763(2).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
November 19, 1954.
Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., Robert E. Brauer, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for libelant.
William R. MacGreevy, Owen T. Armstrong, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent-intervenor.
HULEN, District Judge.
The object of this libel proceeding on the part of the Government is forfeiture of a Cadillac automobile upon which interpleader, Lindburg…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Will Parks Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- A-Mark, Inc. v. United States Secret Service Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- S. Schonfeld Company, Inc. v. SS Akra TenaronDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1973
- United States v. Articles of Food Clover Club Potato ChipsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.